Accessibility Settings

color options

monochrome muted color dark

reading tools

isolation ruler

Stories

Topics

Writers Under Surveillance: Hunter S Thompson’s FBI Files

Writers are dangerous. They have ideas. The proclivity of writers for ideas drove the FBI to investigate many of them — to watch them, follow them, start files on them.

Writers under Surveillance gathers some of these files, giving readers a surveillance-state perspective on writers including Hannah Arendt, Allen Ginsberg, Ernest Hemingway, Susan Sontag and Hunter S Thompson.

Obtained with Freedom of Information Act requests by MuckRock, a nonprofit dedicated to freeing American history from the locked filing cabinets of government agencies, the files on these authors are surprisingly wide ranging; the investigations were as broad and varied as the authors’ own works.

James Baldwin, for example, was so openly antagonistic to the state’s security apparatus that investigators followed his every move. Ray Bradbury, on the other hand, was likely unaware that the Bureau had any interest in his work. (Bradbury was a target because an informant warned that science fiction was a Soviet plot to weaken American resolve.) Ernest Hemingway, true to form, drunkenly called the FBI Nazis and sissies.

The files have been edited for length and clarity, but beyond that everything in the book is pulled directly from investigatory files. Some investigations lasted for years, others just a few days. Some are thrilling narratives. Others never really go anywhere. Some are funny, others quite harrowing. Despite the federal government’s periodic admission of past wrongdoing, investigations like these will probably continue to happen. Like all that seems best forgotten, the Bureau’s investigation of writers should be remembered. We owe it to ourselves.

Following is an extract from the book.

Embed from Getty Imageswindow.gie=window.gie||function(c){(gie.q=gie.q||[]).push(c)};gie(function(){gie.widgets.load({id:’rFJlf3hqTgt2fmYdIpFEhw’,sig:’bNTOhIlBUJrBN-Zt1Iwtnwfo1pDlVxLcF-HG-MwYl6I=’,w:’594px’,h:’396px’,items:’871379774′,caption: true ,tld:’com’,is360: false })});

Hunter S Thompson

According to the FBI, some of their records on Hunter S Thompson, counterculture journalist and Gonzo investigator, may have been destroyed in purges in 1994 and 1998; the the rest were sent over to the National Archives and Records Administration, vault of historically-relevant materials from federal agencies across the government. What remains in the available 58 pages reveal that the agency’s interest in the drug-toting Doctor began before his hit Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas, starting with his coverage of the Hell’s Angels motorcycle gang.

Thompson first came across the Bureau’s radar around the time of the 1967 publication of his book about riding along with the Hell’s Angels motorcycle gang. Thee collection revved up with Thompson’s 1970 entry into the Pitkin County, Colorado sheriff’s race — “despite the natural horror of seeing myself as the main pig.” The inquiry involved on-the-ground interviews, including with the local liquor store clerk.

Confidential informants in Colorado provided additional background for the agency, and a note from one of Thompson’s Kentucky-based childhood acquaintances labeled him as “the bad boy of our neighborhood.” There also appear a few of the Aspen Wall Posters he used for his campaign, highlighting version No 4 and its critique of law enforcement, including a swastika in place of the “x” in then-President Richard Nixon’s name.

However, the Bureau didn’t go so far as to cover Thompson’s death, seemingly a suicide conducted at the man’s kitchen table, the moment at which his FBI file became subject to public disclosure.

DV.load(“https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4995387-Hunter-S-Thompson-Writers-Under-Surveillance.js”, {
responsive: true,
sidebar: false,
text: false,
pdf: false,
container: “#DV-viewer-4995387-Hunter-S-Thompson-Writers-Under-Surveillance”
});


GIJN-member MuckRock is an innovative news site that specializes in using the U.S. Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). Founded in 2010, the Somerville, Mass.-based nonprofit assists journalists, researchers, activists, and citizens in filing requests and then uses the released documents to create original investigative reports and analysis. Follow them on Twitter @MuckRock.

Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.

Republish this article


Material from GIJN’s website is generally available for republication under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license. Images usually are published under a different license, so we advise you to use alternatives or contact us regarding permission. Here are our full terms for republication. You must credit the author, link to the original story, and name GIJN as the first publisher. For any queries or to send us a courtesy republication note, write to hello@gijn.org.

Read Next

News & Analysis

A Funny Thing Happened on Our Way to FOIA

After nine years and over 60,000 requests, MuckRock — the Massachusetts-based news site that specializes in using the US Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) — has been witness to some pretty impressive efforts to keep public information from the public. In the spirit of Sunshine Week, they compiled some of the weirdest, wildest and downright hilarious redactions they’ve received since launching in 2010.

News & Analysis

Document of the Day: Cooking Classified Soviet Borscht With FOIA

For over 50 years, the Central Intelligence Agency kept a tasty secret: a translated copy of the Soviet Army’s 1948 “Manual for the Cook-Instructor of the Ground Forces in Peacetime,” complete with borscht recipes.

News & Analysis

How an Award-Winning Investigation Was Buried in Two Newsrooms

Earlier this month the Indian news site Newslaundry won a prestigious Ramnath Goenka Award for a series of stories based on Right to Information (RTI) requests. The information — over 2,000 letters from Indian state-owned enterprises revealed how political leaders routinely misused up to US$15 million in public funds by asking for media ads or sponsorships for their pet organizations. Here’s the inside story of how the piece almost didn’t come to light.